ABSTRACT
Objectives: Varicella is common infectious disease mainly in childhood, usually is a mild, self-limited illness and complications are usually rare. The incubation period for this disease is generally 14- 16 days but may vary from 7 to 21 days. Varicella in the adults with comorbidities or immunosuppressed children may be severe and prolonged with complications. Method(s): A case report of a 6-year-old girl hospitalized for new-onset manifestations of disseminated vesicular exanthema, the manifestations of which occurred mainly on the chest, back, capillitium, oral cavity, and genital area. The child was suffering from abdominal, knee and lumbosacral pain at that time. The patient's history revealed that 10 days prior to the cutaneous manifestations, she had influenza with bronchopneumonia requiring oxygen therapy, steroids and antibiotics. Result(s): The condition progressed within 48 h, complicated by the development of multi-organ failure, coagulopathy with the development of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy over the course of antiviral, antibiotic and antifungal therapy. Laboratory parameters included high elevation of C-reactive protein, il-6, leukocytosis, neutrophilia and highly elevated liver enzymes. Varicella infection was confirmed by detection of herpes zoster virus - polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from vesicles. The patient received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy at a dose of 2 g/L and fresh frozen plasma, thrombocyte concentrate. The girl was intubated with analogization. Laboratory parameters subsequently revealed high anti CoV-2 positivity, high CoV-2 IgG positivity and negative CoV-2 IgM. The patient's condition did not preclude the course of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) corticosteroids were added to the treatment at a dose of 1 mg/kg weight. Patient's condition stabilized after 1 month. Discussion(s): Our case report presents an example of fulminant complicated life-threatening course of varicella. Even in common respiratory infections, we must think about the risk and consequences of coinfections and post-infectious complications such as in our case especially influenza and COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
A 25-year-old woman, gravida 2, with no medical history of cardiovascular nor other chronic diseases, came to the gynaecologist and described symptoms of a flu-like disease, including very high fever. The gyneacologist prescribed her antibiotics and paracetamol to calm down the fever. At 37 week of gestation she was admitted to the provincial COVID-19 treatment center for isolation and health care in University Clinical Center of Kosovo in Gynecology/Obstetrics department. All bacteriological tests, including hemocultures and cultures of urines were negative. She received antipyretics (acetaminophen), antispasmodics trimethylphloroglucinol and antibiotics (oral azithromycin for 5 days and intravenous ceftriaxone). Despite this treatments, fever and uterine contractions persisted therefor the commission of doctors decided to deliver the baby via ceserean section. The peritoneal cavity and uterus were found to be very inflamed. Fetal appendages as well as the bladder were strewn with eruptive, vesicular lesions bleeding on contact. After few hours after the delivery her temperature (36.5 degreeC) and blood pressure (120/60 mmHg) were normal. The baby was healthy and tested negative on the COVD-19 tests performed. The patients after 2 weeks of treatment and a negative COVID-19 result she was released to go home and was counselled to eat healthy and prescribed multivitamins for her immune system and regular follow ups with the gynecologist. In a period of 8 months the patient became pregnant again and got infected with the COVID-19 again at 25 weeks pregnant. This time the symptoms were not severe and she was followed up at home. The delivery was planned with cesarean section and the baby was in healthy conditions. The patient got vaccinated with Astra Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine after the delivery. Because of their changed physiology, susceptibility to infections, and weakened mechanical and immunological processes, pregnant women are a particularly vulnerable group in any infectious disease outbreak. The requirement to protect the fetus adds to the difficulty of controlling their health. Keywords: COVID-19, pregnant women, cesarean section, Kosovo, astra-zeneca vaccineCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Purpose - to draw attention to an infection that was little known, but has now become a global problem for society;to familiarize readers with the peculiarities of the 2022 monkeypox outbreak and to increase the level of alertness of doctors to this disease. Monkeypox is a global problem because the disease is spreading rapidly, covering 111 countries. Three cases were diagnosed in Ukraine. It is predominantly a self-limited infection, but there are severe and deadly complications. The lethality of this disease ranges from 0% to 11%. The course of the disease is more severe in children and people with reduced immunity. Vertical transmission of the virus from mother to child is possible, resulting in congenital monkeypox. Monkeypox is a zoonotic disease and its natural reservoir is not exactly known, but rodents are most likely to act. In most cases, person-to-person transmission of the virus occurs through close skin to skin contact, often during sexual intercourse. At the beginning of the outbreak 98% of cases of disease were was diagnosed in homo- and bisexuals. Airborne transmission is also possible. Infection is possible through close contact with infectious skin lesions. Clinically, the initial period resembles influenza, but lymphadenopathy is characteristic, which is considered a pathognomonic symptom of mpox. The rash is similar to that of chickenpox, but with more prevalent location on palms and soles than in chickenpox. In the presence of a vesicular rash in a patient, it is necessary to exclude monkeypox. PCR diagnostics of the virus in samples of vesicles or crusts has the greatest diagnostic value. Hygienic skin care is important. Antiviral drugs (tecovirimat, brincidofovir) are recommended only in severe cases. To reduce the spread of infection, international rules apply as for other infections, such as COVID-19. The monkeypox virus vaccine is recommended primarily for groups at risk of infection, including medical personnel who may come into contact with the patient or samples for laboratory testing. Being aware for this infection, following international health regulations, it is possible to prevent the further spread of monkeypox.Copyright © 2023 Tomsk State University. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: In December 2019, a new infection termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was recognised in Wuhan China. In literature only few studies exist on cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 phase. Hence the present study is conducted to know the most common cutaneous manifestations. Material(s) and Method(s): The present study included total of 60 patients presented with skin manifestations during COVID-19 and post COVID-19 phase of both in-patients and out-patients from October 2020 to June 2021. The patients aged more than 18yrs, tested positive for SARS CoV2 with dermatological manifestation during the infection and 3wks after testing negative for SARS CoV2 up to 3 months were included. The dermatological manifestations were recorded during the active COVID-19 infection and during post-COVID-19 period. Result(s): Among the 60 patients the common pattern was maculopapular rash in 24 patients (40%), urticaria seen in 8 patients (13.3%), chilblain seen in 4 patients (6.66%) and livedo reticularis seen in 2 patient (3.33%), during post COVID-19 were acneiform eruption seen in 16 patients (26.4%), vesicular lesions seen in 4 patients (6.66%) and lichen plan us observed in 2 patients (3.33%). Conclusion(s): There is significant association of presence of the dermatological manifestations among the patients with COVID-19 and post COVID-19 period. Study of these dermatological manifestations and their pathogenesis and their significance in human health is useful in avoiding misdiagnosis and proper treatment.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 infection is a disease caused by the type 2 coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) that affects the respiratory mucosa and all those organs that present the type 2 angiotensin receptor (ACE2), within them the skin. Several authors have mentioned the importance of reporting and carrying out databases on skin lesions caused by this virus, since it is related to the detection, severity and prognosis of the systemic condition. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out on the cases of patients who presented dermatological manifestations due to COVID-19, registered in the physical database of the National Specialized Hospital of Villa Nueva, Guatemala, from January 1st to December 31, 2021. Result(s): A total of 144 patients presented dermatological manifestations due to COVID-19, which were: acral lesions (42%), rash (21%), subcutaneous emphysema (12%), oral mucosal lesions (7%), necrosis (6%), erythema multiforme (5%), telogen effluvium (2%), vesicular lesions (2%), urticaria (1%), pityriasis rosea Gibert (1%) and livedo-type lesion (1%). A statistically significant association (p = 0,00) was found in patients who presented dermatological manifestations with vasculonecrotic damage as they were more likely to suffer from severe to critical disease (OR 2,91;95% CI 1063-3083). Conclusion(s): Early identification of cutaneous semiology is essential for timely management of complications associated with COVID-19 disease.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Herpes zoster is an acute viral syndrome caused by the reactivation of latent varicella-zoster virus from a previous infection. It is characterized by a painful, unilateral vesicular rash which is distributed over the territory of a dermatome. It is a significant global burden with the incidence very common in the Asia Pacific region. The frequency is closely related with increasing age and is the most common risk factor for reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. Herpes zoster does not often appear after administration of vaccination. But in the advent of increasing vaccinations for COVID-19, there have been reports of herpes zoster following COVID-19 vaccination. Case: This is a case of a 22-year-old healthy male with a previous history of varicella-zoster virus infection during childhood who developed headache, unilateral vesicular rash over the territory of the left trigeminal nerve and left-sided facial pain and numbness. The patient had previously received the COVID-19 vaccine four days prior to the onset of symptoms. The diagnosis of herpes zoster was made on clinical grounds with no need for additional laboratory work-up to confirm the diagnosis. The patient was treated with herpes zoster antiviral therapy and analgesics where improvement of the patient's condition was noted with eventual crusting of the lesions and without development of complications. Conclusion(s): Herpes zoster is a common disease with a benign course in immunocompetent adults. There is a need for further studies to identify risk factors and explain the possible relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and the development of herpes zoster. Due to the increasing COVID-19 vaccination of the population worldwide, there is a possibility of an increase in the number of herpes zoster cases following COVID-19 vaccination.Copyright © 2022, Philippine College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Post the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there arises the concern of a new epidemic as cases of monkeypox are being confirmed, globally. With the initial clinical manifestation of monkeypox resembling that of the common cold or seasonal flu, recognizing alternative differential diagnoses is imperative as a medical health practitioner. The characteristic monkeypox maculopapular rash with the progression to vesicles and pustules before scabbing can be described in several other infections. Understanding the disease progression and distinct clinical presentation of monkeypox in its various stages may allow for a more expedient diagnosis among healthcare providers. Though eradicated, the clinical presentation of smallpox is the most similar to that of monkeypox; however, smallpox is no longer a concern for the general population. Other conditions such as molluscum contagiosum, syphilis, varicella zoster, measles, rickettsialpox, and scabies can present with rashes that may resemble singular or multiple states of the monkeypox rash progression. The ability to correctly diagnose an individual's condition promptly may allow healthcare providers to provide correct supportive therapies or treatments.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) pandemic has been an unceasing plight with a wide range of clinical presentations. The direct effects of the virus, increased use of medications, and lifestyle changes have contributed to the vulnerability to co-infections. Fungal and bacterial co-infections led to increased morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. Similarly, the surge of skin signs in conjunction with herpes zoster (HZ) manifestations has been reported. In this study, we pooled the data on the clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 patients co-infected with HZ. METHODOLOGY: Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were extensively searched to identify the relevant studies on HZ infection among the SARS-CoV-2 patients. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients (from case reports, series, and retrospective studies) were included in the analysis. Fever was the most common constitutional symptom recorded, followed by cough and dyspnea. A systemic rash was reported in 78.5% of cases with mild symptoms of HZ and SARS-CoV-2 in 87% and 76%, respectively. Only 19% of the cases presented during the prodrome period of SARS-CoV-2. HZV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 8.9% of the cases, and the remaining were diagnosed clinically. SARS-CoV-2 PCR was reported positive in 65 cases (82.3%). Leukopenia was observed in 7 cases (8.9%) and lymphopenia in 25 (31.6%). All patients recovered through conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 escalated the incidence of HZ reactivation. Most of the patients were seen with older individuals either simultaneously or a few days after the SARS-CoV-2 infection, but a few cases were reported during the asymptomatic prodrome period of SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: COVID-19 Co-Infections SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 1:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Baricitinib with Remdesivir has been Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients requiring supplemental oxygen and is used across the United States. However, limited post-marketing surveillance data is currently available for these drugs. We present a case of an unvaccinated, immunocompetent patient with Herpes-Zoster virus (HZV) infection following baricitinib administration. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old African-American male with unknown vaccination status for Herpes zoster presented with worsening shortness of breath for 1 week. He had an SpO2 85% on presentation however had to be subsequently intubated due to worsening hypoxia in the ER. Cardiorespiratory exam was remarkable for diminished bibasilar breath sounds. Lab work was significant for positive COVID-19, elevated leukocytes and deranged inflammatory markers. CT chest showed bilateral ground glass opacities. He received a 14 day course of baricitinib, 10 days of dexamethasone and 5 days of remdesivir during his hospital stay. Tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were performed due to prolonged vent dependence. On day 37 of hospitalization, the patient developed vesicular rashes over his left shoulder and anterior chest. Disseminated HZV infection was confirmed based on serologic testing. Patient received 7 days of valacyclovir with complete resolution. He was eventually discharged to a pulmonary rehabilitation center. DISCUSSION: Baricitinib was first developed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and has been used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and acts by reversible inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2. These proteins have been implicated in COVID-19 pathophysiology;promoting intracellular assembly of SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent cytokine release. Baricitinib in COVID-19 leads to the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine release, antibody production, monocyte activation and viral proliferation. [1] There have been several studies published in support of Baricitinib induced HZV infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients, however there is little data available in COVID patients. Nonetheless, immunomodulatory action is the same. A study comparing the incidence rate (IR) of Baricitinib emergent HZV infection per 100 patient years (PY) vs placebo found IR/100PY 4.3 (p<_0.01) vs 3.1 (p not significant) [2]. Another study found the HZV IR vs placebo of 4.3 vs 1.0, with all-bari-RA IR was 3.2 (95% CI 2.8-3.7) [3]. In our case, the patient developed HZV infection after baricitinib treatment, demonstrating its immunomodulatory effects. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates the ability of baricitinib to cause immunosuppression and hence causing HZV infection in COVID-19 affected patients. Reference #1: Schwartz DM, Bonelli M, Gadina M, O'shea JJ. Type I/II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(1):25. Reference #2: Kevin L, Masayoshi H, Mark C et al. Infections in baricitinib clinical trials for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis.2020 Oct;79(10):1290-1297. Reference #3: Joseph S, Mark C, Tsutomu T et al. Safety profile of Baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 2 years median time in treatment. The Journal of Rheumatology January 2019, 46 (1) 7-18;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.171361 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Mark Aloysius No relevant relationships by Gursharan Kaur No relevant relationships by Mohammed Musa Najmuddin No relevant relationships by mashu shrivastava
ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a rising concern since its declaration as a pandemic by the World Health Organization on 11 March 2020. Recently, its association with multiple underlying organs has been identified that includes cardiac, renal, gastrointestinal, nervous systems, and cutaneous manifestations. Cutaneous COVID-19 findings have been supposedly classified into the following categories: vesicular (varicella-like), papulo-vesiculsar, chilblains-like ("COVID toes") maculopapular, and urticarial morphologies. In this review, we aim to focus on the proposed pathophysiology behind the various dermatological manifestations associated with COVID-19 and their associated management. We also included prevalence and clinical features of the different COVID-19-related skin lesions in our review. A comprehensive narrative review of the literature was performed in PubMed databases. Data from case reports, observational studies, case series, and reviews till June 2022 were all screened and included in the review.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Skin Diseases , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin/pathology , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/etiology , Skin Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 infection is a disease caused by the type 2 coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) that affects the respiratory mucosa and all those organs that present the type 2 angiotensin receptor (ACE2), within them the skin. Several authors have mentioned the importance of reporting and carrying out databases on skin lesions caused by this virus, since it is related to the detection, severity and prognosis of the systemic condition. Material and methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out on the cases of patients who presented dermatological manifestations due to COVID-19, registered in the physical database of the National Specialized Hospital of Villa Nueva, Guatemala, from January 1st to December 31, 2021. Results: A total of 144 patients presented dermatological manifestations due to COVID-19, which were: acral lesions (42%), rash (21%), subcutaneous emphysema (12%), oral mucosal lesions (7%), necrosis (6%), erythema multiforme (5%), telogen effluvium (2%), vesicular lesions (2%), urticaria (1%), pityriasis rosea Gibert (1%) and livedo-type lesion (1%). A statistically significant association (p = 0,00) was found in patients who presented dermatological manifestations with vasculonecrotic damage as they were more likely to suffer from severe to critical disease (OR 2,91;95% CI 1063-3083). Conclusions: Early identification of cutaneous semiology is essential for timely management of complications associated with COVID-19 disease.
ABSTRACT
CASE: A 22-year-old woman with h/o asthma initially presented to the hospital with lip swelling and sore throat. She tested positive for COVID-19 and received a casirivimab-imdevimab (monoclonal antibody) infusion. She returned a week later with worsening lip swelling, dysphagia and conjunctivitis. Physical exam revealed edematous lips with vesicular lesions, no tongue swelling, tonsillar exudate, 4+ conjunctival injection bilaterally with purulent discharge, and shallow clean based clitoral ulceration. She reports no history of allergic reactions, angioedema or exposure to new medications. Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy showed no laryngeal edema but visualized exudates throughout the supraglottis and glottis. C4, ANA, CMV, EBV, throat and blood cultures were negative. STI testing was trichomonas positive and gonorrhea/chlamydia negative. Respiratory virus panel remained positive for COVID-19. HSV swab of lip lesion, HSV 1/2 IgG and IgM were negative. Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgG was elevated (0.60, negative is ≤0.09), IgM equivocal (0.85, negative is ≤0.76), and nasopharyngeal PCR negative. Conjunctival culture showed rare bacteria (S. Aureus) and no leukocytes. She initially received methylprednisolone IV due to concern for angioedema, acyclovir for empiric HSV treatment and empiric antibacterial moxifloxacin eye drops. Given lack of infectious trigger, her presentation was concerning for reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) associated with SARSCoV-2 or Mycoplasma. Prednisone 1mg/kg daily was initiated followed by improvement in oral mucositis and conjunctivitis within days. IMPACT/DISCUSSION: A broad differential is important when evaluating oral swelling and mucositis. Her lack of cutaneous involvement, medication exposure or family history and negative infectious, autoimmune and inflammatory workup make other causes including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, angioedema, and HSV less likely. Our final diagnosis of RIME describes mucocutaneous eruptions likely due to an immune response triggered by bacterial or viral infection. Our patient's RIME may be due to COVID-19 or Mycoplasma given her equivocal Mycoplasma IgM. Eruptions generally involve two or more mucosal sites and occur mostly in children and adolescents. Common presentations include oral erosions and ulcers, purulent bilateral conjunctivitis, or urogenital lesions, which were all seen in our patient. As this is a relatively rare and new condition, no standard of care treatment exists for RIME but systemic steroids have been effective in case reports for initial treatment and subsequent flares. CONCLUSION: RIME is a rare, newly described condition in young patients who develop postinfectious mucocutaneous eruptions of two or more mucosal sites. It has been recently reported in association with COVID-19 and its association with Mycoplasma infection is important to evaluate. This condition is important to recognize and treat given the requirement for higher dose steroids than that used for angioedema.
ABSTRACT
Skin manifestations in patients with COVID-19. A prospective study. As of March 2020, skin lesions associated with COVID-19 have been described. The objectives of the study were to char-acterize the skin lesions in these patients, analyze their temporal relationship, association with the severity of the disease, extracutaneous symptoms and laboratory parameters. A prospective, observational, analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Dermatoses were clas-sified as primary and secondary. Forty-five patients were included, 44.4% with primary dermatoses and 53.3% with secondary lesions. The mean age was 46 years (SD: 17), with a male predominance (68.9%). The primary lesions appeared after a median of 5 days (IQR: 3-10) from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms and the secondary ones after 14.5 days (IQR: 7-20). The primary dermatoses found were maculopapular rash (65%), urticarial (20%, half with vesicular lesions), livedo reticular (10%) and purpura (5%). The most frequent secondary dermatoses were adverse drug reactions (37.1%) and infectious dermatoses (25.9%). Maculopapular rash was associated with moderate COVID-19 and pressure injuries with severe COVID-19 (p < 0.05). The finding of neutrophilia was higher among those with secondary infectious dermatoses (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found when evaluating other laboratory parameters. This work shows the skin manifestations in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in our environment. The most prevalent pattern was the maculopapular rash that was associated with the moderate form of the disease. The appearance of lesions 2 weeks after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms was associated with secondary dermatoses.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is primarily responsible for respiratory symptoms, an increasing number of cutaneous manifestations have been reported. Cutaneous manifestations are reported by patients following disease recovery. OBJECTIVE: We sought to document various skin lesions relating to COVID-19 symptoms either before, during, or after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. METHODS: This was a descriptive study with 273 patients who had cutaneous manifestations after recovering from COVID-19. Each patient provided a thorough medical history and underwent a general physical examination. Following polymerase chain reaction analysis, all participants were confirmed to be COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Acral lesions were the most common, accounting for 39% of all cases. An erythematous maculopapular rash was found in 21% of cases and was the second most common after urticaria, with fewer cases of erythema multiform, vesicular rash (9%), vascular livedo reticularis, figurate erythema, and flexural rash documented. CONCLUSION: The most common cutaneous changes seen in patients with COVID-19 were pseudo-chilblain acral lesions, which had a good prognosis. Vascular rashes within the spectrum of livedo/purpura/necrosis were seen with severe forms of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Lymphangiomas (LG) are uncommon, rare congenital anomalies or acquired lymphatic dilations of a benign flow that can involve the skin [1, 2]. There are main groups of lymphangiomas: 1) a superficial variant, characterized by grouped vesicles (circumscriptum lymphangioma), 2) a deeper variant in the form of a cavernous lymphangioma. The prevalence of LG may be focal or diffuse. Secondary acquired LG with a rarer frequency are known [3, 4]. LG can be one of the manifestations of a symptom complex, for example, Gorham-Stout syndrome, which is characterized by progressive osteolysis [5]. The rare occurrence of LG, clinical diversity, undulating course of congenital forms, the possibility of an acquired nature of the disease causes a high risk of diagnostic errors in establishing the final diagnosis. At the Department of Dermatovenereology, Cosmetology and Additional Professional Education of Smolensk State Medical University for the period from 2018 to 2021, 5 patients (age from 5 to 17 years) with LG were observed. Of these: in four children, the disease existed from birth, in one girl it had an acquired character and developed after covid infection [4]. Gender characteristics: 4 girls (5, 6, 12 and 17 years old) and 1 boy (9 years old). All patients are urban residents. The time to establish the final diagnosis from the moment of seeking medical help ranged from 15 months to 12 (!) years, the average value being 6.5 years. The range of diagnoses of LG 'masks': herpetic infection, molluscum contagiosum, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, epidermolysis bullosa. A frequent change in diagnoses was established in the same patient. Clinical case 1. The boy is 12 years old. The debut of skin lesions from birth and progression to 3 years of age, then spontaneous regression within 4 years (without signs of dermatosis). From 7 years to the present, there has been an increase in the number of rashes. Localization: the skin of the lateral surface of the trunk. Features of the rash: flesh-colored and/or reddish- purple bubbles. A pathognomonic symptom of 'frog calves' is found. The frequent autodestructive effect on the rash provokes its subsequent progression. Family history: his father is a liquidator of the atomic catastrophe in Chernobyl. Previous diagnoses: molluscum contagiosum, herpes zoster. Clinical case 2. The girl is 17 years old. The debut of the disease from birth. Lack of progression up to 5 years of age (up to 5 years of age did not apply to dermatologists). At the age of 5, she began to engage in rhythmic gymnastics (she continues to practice professionally at the present time) and noted an active increase in the number and size of the elements of the rash. She repeatedly consulted dermatologists: diagnoses of molluscum contagiosum (laser removal), herpetic infection (courses of antiherpetic therapy without effect) were assumed. The diagnosis was established 12 years after the moment of seeking medical help. Unilateral location of the rash along the inner surface of the right upper limb with transition to the axillary region;on the right lateral surface of the body, the right inguinal-femoral fold and the inner surface of the right thigh. Focuses of a rash in the form of different sizes of vesicular elements with a tendency to lymphorrhea and oozing, areas of maceration around. Single elements with a hemorrhagic component. The patient notes an increase in the inflammatory response and vesicle lymphorrhea after each workout. Dermatoscopy: yellow-pink lacunae alternating with single dark red lacunae. Histological examination: multiple dilated lymphatic vessels in the papillary and reticular dermis. Clinical case 3. Girl 6 years old. Sick from birth. The diagnosis of LG of the genitals was established at the age of 1, 5 years. Due to the localization of the rash in the external genital area, the girl's parents (at the age of 1 month) consulted an obstetrician-gynecologist, who suggested a hemangioma and referred to a dermatologist. The disease is of a family nature her grandmother (on the maternal side) and her lder brother have similar rashes on the skin of the trunk and in the mouth. The diagnosis was verified by histological examination. The pathological process is localized in the area of the labia majora and labia minora: multiple vesicular rashes with translucent contents, easily traumatized and accompanied by itching, were found. Conclusions: LG is a multidisciplinary problem, which is caused by mimicry of manifestations, varied localization and prevalence of the rash. To verify the diagnosis, the following algorithm should be followed: 1) the debut more often at birth or in the first months of life (with the exception of acquired forms of LG);2) the nature of evolution: a stable state or slow progression in the absence of traumatic factors;3) clinical features: the formation of grouped deep vesicles that resemble 'frog eggs'. The color of the bubbles is transparent or red-purple due to the hemorrhagic component. LG lesions may have hemangioma components. It should be remembered about the frequent localization of LG on the mucous membrane of the cheeks, tongue and floor of the oral cavity, which can manifest itself as bleeding from the elements of the rash when chewing or when providing dental care;4) biopsy reveals dilated lymphatic vessels in the upper layers of the dermis.
ABSTRACT
The introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines has led to an immense sense of relief for the global population. However, since the introduction of these vaccines, there have been several reports related to the side effects. A young woman presented to her primary care doctor with a vesicular rash three days after the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which was preceded by a low-grade fever for one day. Our case report highlights the challenges in diagnosing a vesicular rash post the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Identifying the cause of a vesicular rash following vaccination has remained a challenge among primary care practitioners.
ABSTRACT
Introduction COVID 19 (SARS 2 virus) was first isolated in China in December 2019 from the specimen of patients presented with lower respiratory tract infection. It was declared a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 infected patients can presents with different dermatological manifestations even in some cases;the dermatological manifestation may be the only presenting complaints of the patients. Objective To find dermatological manifestations in patients infected with COVID 19 virus. Methods After getting ethical approval from the hospital ethical and research committee, all the tested positive for SARS 2 virus were included in the study. Strict precautionary measures were taken according to the WHO guidelines. Patients having any chronic dermatological disease in the past or having more than two weeks duration of any dermatological illness were excluded. Photographs were taken from the patients having any dermatological manifestations. These photographs were then shared with the consultant dermatologists of the unit by hiding the course of clinical illness of the patients. The expert opinion of the consultant was considered as the final one. Results Mean age was 41,53 years±1.6008E1 (3 months to 85 years) with 160 males (65.6%) and 84 females (34.4%). Pseudo chilblains, maculopapular rash, vesicular rash, and urticarial rash were noted in 13.9%, 15.6%, 4.9%, and 7%, respectively. Oral cavity erythema, ulcers, and erosions were noted in 25%, 11.9%, and 14.3% of patients. Based on gender, the p-value was significant for maculopapular rash (p=0.02) and oral petechiae (p=0.04), while based on age, the p-value was significant for urticarial rash (p=0.01) and vesicular rash (p=0.03). Conclusion COVID 19 is a severe form of viral illness with a fatal outcome. Dermatological manifestations may sometimes be the sole presenting complaints of the patients.
ABSTRACT
Case report-IntroductionIn December 2019, the first cluster of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was identified in Wuhan, China. The disease was declared a global pandemic on 11th March 2020. COVID-19 was initially thought to cause respiratory complications only, however several extra pulmonary manifestations of the infection have since emerged.We report a rare case of reactive arthritis (ReA), urticarial rash and angioedema in a young female secondary to COVID-19 infection. Rashes were recently added to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of COVID-19 demonstrating their significance.Case report-Case descriptionA 31-year-old female doctor was admitted with acute swelling of her lips, dysphagia, and a widespread urticarial rash. Preceding this she had a one-week history of fever, cough, and constitutional symptoms of malaise and weight loss. Her symptoms had started at the end of April 2020 during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Three days later she developed painful swelling of her wrists, elbows, knees, and hands. She reported no back or sacroiliac joint pain, enthesitis or any previous history of inflammatory joint pains. She had a history of platelet dysfunction and was treated with Desmopressin.Clinical examination revealed a widespread urticarial rash over her face, limbs, and trunk, with no nail abnormalities. She had active synovitis in her right wrist, elbow, and mild bilateral knee effusions. All other joints including spine and sacroiliac joints were normal. She had no dactylitis or enthesitis. Systemic examination was normal. Investigations revealed Hb 113 g/L, MCV 88.2 fL, Platelets 282 x 109/L, WCC 6.6 x 109/L and Lymphocytes of 0.63 x 109/L with normal neutrophil and eosinophil count. CRP was raised at 107mg/L. She had a negative autoimmune screen including ANA, ANCA, IgM-RF, anti-CCP antibodies and HLA B27. Plain radiographs of knees were normal. SARS CoV-2 PCR was positive following a nasal swab. Urine and blood cultures were negative. Treatment was commenced with intravenous hydrocortisone and antihistamines with resolution of her angioedema symptoms;however, her rash and arthritis persisted.The patient was diagnosed with Reactive Arthritis (ReA), urticarial rash and angioedema secondary to COVID-19 infection. Prednisolone 30mg daily was started, and within a week her arthritis and rash markedly improved. Prednisolone was tapered over six weeks. By her two-month clinic follow up, she reported no further joint swelling and was functioning normally.Case report-DiscussionThe most common complication of COVID-19 is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) however several other serious complications have been identified including cardiac injury, thromboembolic events, neurological abnormalities, and an aggravated inflammatory response causing a cytokine storm.ReA is a post infectious arthritis commonly seen following gastrointestinal or genitourinary infections and is yet to be recognised as a complication of this disease. ReA most commonly presents as an asymmetrical peripheral or axial spondyloarthropathy. The affected joints do not contain pathogen. More than half of ReA cases resolve spontaneously within six months without requiring long-term treatments.Up to 20% of patients with COVID-19 infection have been shown to develop cutaneous manifestations including erythematous rash, vesicular rash, acral ischaemia, rash with petechiae, and widespread urticaria. This has led to the recent addition of rashes to the World Health Organisation (WHO) Criteria for diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Additionally, as COVID-19 has an incubation period of 14 days where patients can be asymptomatic, cutaneous manifestations may serve as an early indicator of infection, aiding in a more rapid diagnosis.Case report-Key learning pointsWe present a rare case of ReA secondary to COVID-19 infection, with complete resolution of symptoms following administration of oral glucocorticoids. A detailed history and examination of t e musculoskeletal system should be undertaken in all patients presenting with COVID-19. Urticarial rashes should be considered as an early symptom of COVID-19 infection as per the WHO criteria for diagnosis. Glucocorticoids can be considered in treating patients with this presentation, where traditional anti-inflammatory agents have been refractory or contraindicated.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 has recently been associated with the reactivation of varicella zoster virus in patients. This is potentially an observation of a local susceptibility of the skin in areas of vesicle formation. This article explores the dermatologic manifestations that have been linked to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, their infectious risk, as well as potential confounding factors. An isotopic response may be occurring due to the occurrence of an immunocompromised district incited by sustained inflammation mediated by inflammatory cytokines.